Apuntarme a la lista de espera

Estadísticas › Rentabilidades a largo plazo › Rebalancing and drawdowns

Monthly rebalancing deepened the 2008 drawdown by five percentage points

Measure, monthly rebalanced 60/40Valor
Rentabilidad anualizada9.1%
Annualised volatility9.8%
Return divided by volatility0.92
Sharpe ratio net of the short rate0.47
Annualised rebalancing trade10.2% of the portfolio
Annualised trading cost4.4 basis points
Troughs deeper than 15 per centFive: 1970, 1974, 1987, 2002, 2009
Extra 2008 drawdown versus buy and holdabout 5 percentage points
Drawdown máximoNot reported in the source

Monthly rebalanced 60/40 US stock and Treasury portfolio, monthly data 1960 to 2017. US stocks are the value weighted NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ series; Treasuries come from Federal Reserve data. The study reports no t statistics, and neither the absolute maximum drawdown nor any recovery time appears in it.

A monthly rebalanced 60/40 portfolio returned 9.1 per cent a year from 1960 to 2017 at 9.8 per cent volatility. Its maximum drawdown in the 2007 to 2009 crisis was about five percentage points worse than buy and hold, because rebalancing buys the falling asset.

9.1%Monthly rebalanced 60/40 annual return, 1960 to 2017
9.8%Annualised volatility
0.47Sharpe ratio net of the short rate
about 5 pointsExtra 2008 drawdown versus buy and hold

Solo para miembros

El resto de esta página es para miembros

Below this point there are 5 sections, 1 table and 3 named sources, roughly 650 words of it. Every figure carries the source it came from and the date the data is from.

Puedes seguir consultando todas las estadísticas de la biblioteca gratis. La introducción y el resumen están siempre abiertos.