Stats › Concentration and breadth › Equal weight
Equal weight against cap weight
Take the S&P 500 and hold every company in it in exactly the same amount. The same money in the smallest as in the largest. That's the equal weighted version of the index. Identical companies to the one everybody quotes, in completely different proportions, rebalanced back to level every quarter.
This page puts the two side by side. What the difference was worth across the 2000s, how the relationship flipped in the years after, and where the two stand in the first half of 2026. The reason it gets a page of its own is that it isolates one single variable. No stock picking, no timing, no sector calls. Same five hundred names, different position sizes, and outcomes that diverge by an amount most people would not believe if you told them. There's a section further down on when each construction wins, which has a fairly obvious logic once you see it, and a section on the costs of the equal weighted version, which almost nobody mentions when they show you the headline gap.
Three sources sit behind this, all dated and linked at the bottom. The 2000s figures and the 2026 figures come from different places, so they aren't one continuous series, and I'd rather you know that going in than find it out later.
The equal weighted S&P 500 holds the same five hundred companies as the cap weighted version, in identical proportions, rebalanced quarterly. Over the 2000s that difference was worth 73 percentage points: cap weight returned -9% cumulatively while equal weight returned +64.0%. In the 2010s and early 2020s the relationship reversed, with cap weight ahead as mega caps led. In the first half of 2026 equal weight was back in front, +12.1% against +10.2%.
Members only
The rest of this page is for members
Below this point there are 7 sections, 1 chart and 3 named sources, roughly 1200 words of it. Every figure carries the source it came from and the date the data is from.
You can keep browsing every statistic in the library for free. The intro and the summary are always open.